Comments Stream

who evaluates human reason? and how? is this shattered coronation a narrow pass in this evaluation? help me understand what you’re saying because i find it unreasonable to accept any reason that cannot be implemented and i see no purpose in such a reason.

We evaluate it ourselves. It’s fate to understand and not to understand however elevated our faculties. The broken crown is the metaphor I used. I could post it although I don’t think there is any readership here from what I can see.

readership?
since nobody demands money for the services provided i have no problem and i don’t need thousands of bots fake reads to make me feel read just because i paid as that’s what i would probably get on a site with paid memberships and ‘big readership (of bots)”

we may evaluate ourselves but it’s impossible to be correct while doing it thinking there is no external evaluation i must take into consideration – we must at least think the highest possible external evaluation of our evaluating – the canon of Polykleitos for example it was not that perfect because he found a handsome young man that according to him had perfect analogies. he went with his mind beyond that personal evaluation.

i’m happy here with few real readers.

Yes, of course, there is a larger reality than shaped by subjective thought. I don’t personally believe, however, that there is an evaluation that is carried out beyond consciousness, or that exceeds nature in its manifestation. The human mind has limits, but they are not as finite as people generally suppose. Writing poems is an extraordinary way to address those unsettled limitations in my mind. Finally, objective correlatives are very powerful, and have been used to great effect by many artists of genius.

I’m encouraged by the use of the word “find” which includes for me, at least, a welcome human dimension.

so there is a level which connects the human body with what else? Ithaca,

when you are not in control ruling your body then parasites like the suitors try to win your what else? soul. Penelope that patiently waits for your return, your consciousness that’s why I said to another ukaneer that we are whole and have both ‘sexes’ , our Consciousness and our Soul,

now look what happened, a huge distraction Troy this world we live in, full of Sirens and Cyclops and witches and mommy-boys, traitors, cowards, impatient miserable sods…
at this level Troy had to be conquered at any cost, it has to be destroyed since the world arrogantly brags about its superiority over individuality.

there is telepathy in Odyssey expressed in the name of Telemahos he who fights from a distance. yes our Consciousness is going to be distracted.

Penelope Soul is like a sitting duck for the parasites suitors. Penelope means … duck.

The origin of her name is believed by Robert S. P. Beekes to be Pre-Greek and related to pēnelops (πηνέλοψ)[1] or pēnelōps (πηνέλωψ), glossed by Hesychius as “some kind of bird”[2] (today arbitrarily identified with the Eurasian wigeon, to which Linnaeus gave the binomial Anas penelope), where -elōps (-έλωψ) is a common Pre-Greek suffix for predatory animals;[3] however, the semantic relation between the proper name and the gloss is not clear. In folk etymology, Pēnelopē (Πηνελόπη) is usually understood to combine the Greek word pēnē (πήνη), “weft”, and ōps (ὤψ), “face”, which is considered the most appropriate for a cunning weaver whose motivation is hard to decipher

and you like Odysseus have to exterminate Penelope’s suitors
starting with Antinoos all the names Homer used mean something
I will just explain to you what the first suitor’s name means and why he is the first Odysseus has to kill

Antinoos means Anti Noos , Nous
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nous

you know what anti means

so that’s why in order to return to the right place you have to be the right person a master of reasonableness and the only way to master reasonableness is to understand how moral and virtuous you have to become,

the second suitor’s name Evrimahos the one who fights using all means

the third’s Amfinomos the one who distorts the law
the fourth’s Agelaos the one who cons the populace

clean your home city your kingdom from this dirt showing no mercy whatsoever.

in the myth of Er in Plato we learn that the deceased Odysseus selects a reincarnation of a simple man without fame or wealth someone who would have a quiet life and would remain obscure.

thinking about nous. a lot. it must be solved
Agatha Christie perhaps is the only writer I would admire as much as the ones I mentioned.

(just my odd impersonal opinion)

I forgot George Eliot..

yes The Mill on the Floss was as if penned by one of the masters of literature. perhaps there are women writing as anon or using male names that can change their voice so much that sexes become either indistinguishable or neutered.

While continuing to contribute pieces to the Westminster Review, Evans resolved to become a novelist, and set out a pertinent manifesto in one of her last essays for the Review, “Silly Novels by Lady Novelists”[18] (1856). The essay criticised the trivial and ridiculous plots of contemporary fiction written by women. In other essays, she praised the realism of novels that were being written in Europe at the time, an emphasis on realistic storytelling confirmed in her own subsequent fiction. She also adopted a nom-de-plume, George Eliot; as she explained to her biographer J. W. Cross, George was Lewes’s forename, and Eliot was “a good mouth-filling, easily pronounced word”

they didn’t manage to write in an at least neutral voice, have read most of the ladies you mentioned they were always too feminine too this and that. not even attacking traditional female values for the sake of new ideals has helped a female write better than men or as good as male writers. they tried to be various things. yes they wrote some very good stories. as women afflicted by what society and family expect from them even as trained soldiers of feminism.

(but boy are we better journalists… tee hee)